Why would a higher standard of evidence be required? If you've established the facts, there's nowhere else to goBlackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ No...you're an idiot.
In order to deprive a defendant of their LIBERTY a higher standard of evidence is required.
But that does NOT mean that civil courts establish something else.
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.